First of all, it would be eight teams, not four. And, the criteria used to pick those teams would
be wins and losses (W/L), strength of schedule (SOS), and conference
championship participation (CCP).
The W/L of a team are easy to determine. The SOS would be determined by wins and
losses of opponents and the opponents of a team's opponents. After an exhaustive (i.e. five or six minute)
search on the internet, the current SOS ranking that is the closest to the type I would use is predictionmachine.com.
So, I’d take a team’s SOS ranking, multiple it by 0.1, add it to their losses, and then subtract it from their wins. Then, the conference runner-up gets an
additional 0.5, and the conference champion gets an additional 1.0, in every conference that
has a championship game. That final number would be
their play-off rating (PR). For example, Alabama’s SOS ranking is 4; multiple that by 0.1 = 0.4. 1 loss + 0.4 subtracted from 12 wins =
10.6. Add another 1.0 for CCP = 11.6 PR.
Four Team Play-off
#1 Alabama (11.6 PR) vs. #4 Ohio State
(6.8 PR)
#2 FSU (10.3 PR) vs. #3 Oregon (8.7
PR)
Same four as chosen by the committee. However, when you go to eight teams, it changes quite a bit.
Eight Team
Play-off
#1 Alabama (11.6 PR) vs. #8 Ole
Miss (5.2 PR)
#2 FSU (10.3 PR) vs. #7 TCU (5.8)
#3 Oregon (8.7 PR) vs. #6 Miss.
State (5.9 PR)
#4 Ohio State (6.8 PR) vs. #5
MIzzou (6.2 PR)
#9 Arizona
(4.7 PR), #10 UGA (4.6 PR), and #11 Baylor (4.4 PR) would be left on the
outside, looking in.
What about the chance of one of the “lessor”
conference champions sneaking into the play-offs, you ask? Under my system, Conference USA champ,
Marshall would have a 0.1 PR this year.
Mid-American champ, N. Illinois would have a -2.1 PR, and Mountain West
champ, Boise State, would have a 2.7 PR.
No comments:
Post a Comment